Open Science
 

The reporting period was marked by a further consolidation and institutionalization of Open Science at the MPIB. A central milestone was the adoption of Institute-wide guidelines on Open Science and research data management (see https://os-rdm.mpib.berlin/guidelines/) by the Institute's Board of Directors in fall 2025. The guidelines were developed in a participatory process involving researchers from different disciplines, research support service units, external experts, and the MPG Administrative Headquarters (Blunk, 2025). They articulate the MPIB's strategic commitment to Open Science in line with (inter)national recommendations while explicitly accommodating the methodological and disciplinary diversity of the Institute's empirically oriented research. The guidelines define shared standards and workflows and provide orientation for Institute members. To ensure adaptability, annual revisions are planned, supported by "guideline ambassadors" embedded in the research centers.

The twice-awarded Open Science Innovation Award further highlights the MPIB's commitment to Open Science. In 2024, Stefan Appelhoff was honored for adding EEG as a modality to the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) and developing a dedicated Python software package MNE-BIDS, which simplifies the conversion of EEG data to BIDS format, and reads and analyzes entire BIDS datasets. In 2025, Aaron Peikert, Hannes Diemerling, Andreas M. Brandmaier, and Maximilian S. Ernst received the award for designing and implementing a workshop on "Reproducible Research in R," including openly reusable teaching materials, software, and publications.

Beyond these institutional measures, MPIB researchers made substantial contributions to Open Science. These include conceptual considerations regarding, e.g., preregistration as a means to reduce inferential uncertainty (Peikert et al., in press), and the extension of FAIR principles to scientific theories as versioned, reusable research objects (Van Lissa et al., 2026). In terms of Open Science practices, robustness analyses were conducted (e.g., Pit, 2026), and open data sources were compiled for reuse (in addition to data accompanying a published manuscript, e.g., Yang et al., 2025). Open software tools were developed that facilitate, e.g., automated testing of computational reproducibility embedded in R Markdown workflows (Brandmaier & Peikert, 2025), or the integration of large language models into online experiments via a chat interface (Bermudez Schettino et al., 2025). Open educational resources were published mostly as online tutorials. Examples include a practical overview of open-source large language models for behavioral science using the Hugging Face ecosystem (Hussain et al., 2024) or estimating statistical power for structural equation models in developmental cognitive science (Buchberger et al., 2024).

Open Access (OA) publishing remains a strong pillar of the Institute's Open Science profile. Of the 754 journal articles (including special issues/sections) published between 2023 and 2025 (as of June 30, 2026), about 91% were available in OA (distributed as follows: 41% in hybrid journals, 36% in genuine OA journals, 14% via green OA, plus 9% closed access). In addition, seven OA books were published during the reporting period, three of which were co-financed by the MPIB's OA publication fund, which also supported nine OA journal articles where no central MPG or third-party funding was available.

Since 2022, systematic output monitoring has been expanded beyond publications to include published research data and software code, now also documented on the MPIB website.

Finally, MPIB researchers actively contribute to Open Science networks through lectures, workshops, and engagement in MPG-internal and external initiatives, including the MPG Open Science Ambassadors network and the German Reproducibility Network.

Selected Publications

Bermudez Schettino, R., Dasmeh, A., & Brinkmann, L. (2025). Facilitating the integration of LLMs into online experiments with simple chat (Version posted online November 26, 2025). arXiv, 2511.19123. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.19123
Blunk, J. (2025). Schritte auf dem Weg zu Open-Science- & Forschungsdatenmanagement-Guidelines am Beispiel des Max-Planck-Instituts für Bildungsforschung (MPIB). o-bib, 12(4), Article 6212. https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/6212
Brandmaier, A. M., & Peikert, A. (2025). Automated reproducibility testing in R Markdown. Collabra: Psychology, 11(1), Article 138638. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.138638
Buchberger, E. S., Ngo, C. T., Peikert, A., Brandmaier, A. M., & Werkle-Bergner, M. (2024). Estimating statistical power for structural equation models in developmental cognitive science: A tutorial in R. Behavior Research Methods, 56, 6862–6879. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02396-2
[Andreas M. Brandmaier and Markus Werkle-Bergner contributed equally to this work.].
Hussain, Z., Binz, M., Mata, R., & Wulff, D. U. (2024). A tutorial on open-source large language models for behavioral science. Behavior Research Methods, 56(8), 8214–8237. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02455-8
Peikert, A., Ernst, M. S., & Brandmaier, A. M. (in press). Why does preregistration increase the persuasiveness of evidence? A Bayesian rationalization. Meta-Psychology.
Pit, I. L. (2026). Accuracy prompts increase the quality of news sharing while attitudinal congruence robustly reduces it. Journal of Robustness Reports, Article 5-rr2. https://doi.org/10.21468/JRobustRep.5-rr2
Van Lissa, C. J., Peikert, A., Ernst, M. S., van Dongen, N. N. N., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Brandmaier, A. M. (2026). To be FAIR: Theory specification needs an update. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 21(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916251401850
Yang, Y., Spektor, M. S., Thoma, A. I., Hertwig, R., & Wulff, D. U. (2026). DfE-DB: A systematic database of 3.8 million human decisions across experience-based tasks (Version posted online May 27, 2026). BioRxiv, December 16, 2025. https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.12.693971
Go to Editor View